Where did the miners go?

I was back in Mansfield a few weeks ago visiting my father's side of the family and over lunch talk turned to the pits and how their closures still affect some communities today. My family has a long history of mining, my grandfather was the last in a long line of them and he worked Welbeck Colliery until an accident led to his retirement. 25 years ago mining was a "cause" championed by every trade unionist, militant student and card carrying member of the Labour Party. At that point, the National Coal Board employed 191,000 mineworkers at 170 collieries. In 1999 however, these figures had dwindled to 10,000 working in 15 privately owned pits. There is no official record of what happened to the tens of thousands of miners forced into unemployment however a study by the Coalfield Communities Campaign made in the mid-nineties painted a pretty grim picture. Of 900 miners surveyed, more than 50% were out of work more than a year after the pit and 46% were unemployed. Only 6%% were in training or education. More worrying was that 30% of respondents were claiming sickness benefits. While the study is over 10 years old, I suspect the figures today would not offer any additional comfort. I suspect that many of the miners will now be in their retirement or edging near to it. What concerns me is the likelihood that many of these men if they have not found regular and substantial employment after the closures or if they have been surviving on sickness benefits for a decade then they will now be in a particularly vulnerable financial position. While EU funds have been used in regenerative projects such as the visitor and education centre at Bolsover Castle in Derbyshire and the Technology Training and Business Centre as Basford Hall College Nottinghamshire, I suspect more can be done, and we need to listen carefully to community leaders for their guidance on where these funds are needed most and how we can ensure the miners and their communities are looked after. I would be very interested to hear if anyone has a regeneration initiative for their area and how best they think this could be funded.

Serbia & Kosovo - a step back

I have been watching this weekend with an increasing feeling of uneasiness the violence in Belgrade which erupted after the Kosovan declaration of independence. Such mindless thuggery by a few does a great disservice to the majority of law abiding Serbian citizens and has set back any prospect of Serbia's entry into the union. Javier Solana has made perfectly clear that the Co-Operation Agreement with Serbia will be put on ice until the violence subsides.

Research & Development Opportunities in the East Midlands

Research & Development is an essential element in the functioning of industrialised countries and essential for the support of policies such as consumer protection and protection of the environment. Currently, the EU only invests 1.9% of its GDP in R&D whereas the US and Japan invest 2.7% and 3% respectively. Europe also lags behind the US and Japan in number of patent applications. However, the EU is seeking to redress this, mainly through the Framework Programme for Research & Technological Development which establishes legal and administrative structures and provides financial resources for the conduct of research (we are now on the Sixth Framework Programme). With a budget of $176 million this programme packs punch and is definitely a source of industry that institutions in the East Midlands should be aiming their sights at. We have a number of excellent universities in the region who have the right people and institutions in place and I would support in any way I can any applications being made in the East Midlands for funding under this programme.

Cuba - new beginnings?

Fidel Castro is stepping down as President of Cuba after 49 years in office. I was lucky enough to visit Cuba in 2001. It's a fantastic country and the people were extremely welcoming, but the poverty and hardship was evident. The EU Aid Commissioner Louis Michel has already stated the EU reiterates its willingnew to engage with Cuba in a constructive dialogue. It will be interesting to see what this leads to. I think there would be mutual benefits to such a dialogue. Obviously the hope is that the people of Cuba will experience democracy and political freedom for the first time in nearly half a century, but I think we can also learn a lot from Cuba's health care and education systems which are widely plauded. More than 50% of 18-24 year old Cubans are university educated and life expenctancy and infant mortality in line with that of the US than Latin America. I would be intrigued to find out how they have sustained such important social institutions over the years with such a weakened economy.

New email

We seem to be have some technical difficulties with the email catetaylorforMEP@yahoo.com, if you did have any queries about my campaign, want to assist or get more information please use catetaylorlabour@yahoo.com. Also, if you think any Labour colleagues might be interested in this blog, please feel free to forward on the details and my email. Thanks so much for your support.

UKIP- the usual nonsense

I'm probably not Prince Charles's biggest fan, but good on Gary Titley MEP for his comments on UKIP's Nigel Farage childlishly refusing to stand up or applaud the Prince's speech on climate change at the European Parliament this week. "I was embarrassed and disgusted when the Leader of the UK Independence Party, Nigel Farage remained firmly seated during the lengthy standing ovation Prince Charles received. I had not realised Mr Farage's blind adherence to right wing politics involved disloyalty and discourtesy to the Royal Family. He should be thoroughly ashamed of himself and should apologise to the British people he represents".

Strange behaviour from Mr Farage who earlier in the week had claimed that UKIP "will always try and put what we see as the national interest above our own party interest." This comment was made in the context of UKIP announcing that in the next general election UKIP will not stand "against MPs from the Conservative or Labour parties who are prepared to campaign on the same issues that (UKIP) are." Apparently there can be no similar deal with eurosceptic MEPs, because the party list system used in European elections meant they will not be able to target specific candidates. However, Mr Farage states that he expects to make big gains in the European elections next June on the back of the Government's confirmation that there will be no referendum on the Lisbon Reform Treaty (see my blog entry dated 9 February 2008 for why I think we don't need a referendum).

I'm hoping that for the electorate of the East Midlands it will be a case of "once bitten twice shy" when it comes to casting a UKIP vote next June after their experiences with Robert Kilroy-Silk (now founder of Veritas). I've always thought standing as Member of the European Parliament is so obviously the wrong platform for a Eurosceptic. If you don't believe that an institution can bring advantages to a region, then what exactly is the point in you being part of that institution? I find it difficult to see how UKIP representatives can validly claim they will be able to put their constituents' interests in Europe above their party's when that party's interests are so at odds with the core principles of the European Union. Surely Westminster is the more appropriate place to make your stand against Europe? I'm not encouraging Euroscpetics, far from it. What I am saying is take your fight elsewhere, and let the rest of us get on with the task of bringing the benefits of the Union to our regions.

MEPs and Expenses - getting your money's worth

The revelations of Derek Conway's exploitation of the Westminster expense system took the media spotlight (albeit briefly) away from the members of the European Parliament. The British media does love to stir up a hornets nest among the electorate with the frequent "gravy train" accusations it makes against the European Parliament. While it is true some members in the past have rather naively indulged in some rather dubious financial practices (former French PM Edith Cresson hiring her dentist as an adviser being one of my personal favourites), times have changed and reform is in the air. Among other things, Commission officials are carefully vetted and MEPs sign a declaration of interests which is available to all on the European Parliamentary website. From next year, MEPs salaries will be re-evaluated so that all new members are paid the same monthly gross salary, all travel expenses to Strasbourg will require proof of receipt and the most controversial daily allowance that MEPs currently receive will be linked to duration. If you only work half a day in Brussels, half a days expenses is what you will get. Common sense really.

It remains to be seen however if the British media will give credit where it is due or whether they will continue to push the message that the European Parliament is simply a burden on British tax payer's pockets. In my campaign over the next year, I want to hammer home to the people of the East Midlands a positive message that Europe is good for us and to dispel the myths surrounding the Parliament and its members which distract the electorate's attention from the real work going on in Brussels. Take a look at www.europarl.org.uk/guide/ThingsTheySayItems/ThingsTheySay for a considered and sensible rebuke of the usual Eurosceptic nonsense.

Human Trafficking and Europe

Many of you will have seen the recent shocking special report by ITV news on the trafficking of women and children from Europe into the UK, mainly for use in this country's brothels. The Government estimates that at any one time up to 4,000 trafficked women are being forced into prostitution. This situation is of course unacceptable. However I was recently concerned to read that the Government has yet to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings, which recommends any individual found to have been trafficked must be given time in safe housing to be assessed by experts. While the covention remains unsigned, its recommendations will not be implemented leading to vulnerable women and children being sent immediately on discovery by UK authorities to immigration detention centres. These people are victims in a hideous cycle of abuse and exploitation and should be treated as such. I hope the Government sees fit to ratify the Convention at its earliest opportunity so that these recommendations can be put into effect.

If you would like to find out more information on this, please take a look at www.ecpat.org.uk and www.eaves4women.co.uk.

EU investment in Britain

Work has just started on the new tram network up in Edinburgh and already it's causing traffic chaos. I hope the people of Edinburgh hang in there, unfortunately I suspect it will get a lot worse before it gets better! It will however be worth the short term inconvenience. When completed, like Nottingham, Edinburgh will have the benefit of a cheap, clean and energy efficient network of public transport available to all. I was living in Nottingham when the trams first opened for business and saw the impact they had on the city. It was in particular quite gratifying in September 2006 to see the operators (Arrow Consortium) report a profit of £1.2 million, confounding the critics and showing that private-public partnerships can in some instances be an excellent way of boosting investment into public services (Nottingham City Council is a major partner in Arrow).

The tram network was of course a recepient of a large amount of EU investment, around £3.5 million, and a great example of the benefits the Union has brought to the region. For more examples, take a look at the website of Catherine Stihler MEP (http://www.cstihlermep.com/) and click on 100 Labour Achievements in Europe. It's an illuminating and positive reflection on what Europe has done for us over the years. I've had the pleasure of meeting Catherine a couple of times now - she's a wonderful lady and an excellent MEP for Scotland, and definitely one to watch. I wish her all the best in her re-election next year.

Tony for President.....?!

Also linked to the below and a current hot topic of debate is the rumour that Tony Blair has been asked to consider running for President of the European Council, a post that will be newly created under the Lisbon Reform Treaty. Whatever you thought of Tony Blair as Prime Minister, even his greatest critics I think would find it pretty hard to deny he is one of the best international statesmen of our time. Widely respected abroad, he would bring great gravitas to such a role and increase the presence of the Union on the world stage. I do hope he goes for it and that the Party gives him its full backing.

The Reform Treaty - storm in a tea cup?

A few people have been asking my views on the Reform Treaty -I could write for hours on this but I'll try to keep it brief! In a nutshell, no I don't think the Treaty is a storm in a teacup as it brings wide ranging and much needed reform to the institutions of the Union, however, I also do not think it is the monstrous European revolution that some sections of the media like to play it up to be. As ever, sensationalism sells, calm rational evaluation does not.

The main argument always levelled, and the one the Conservatives do love to bleat on about, is that there should have been a referendum on the Treaty as promised by the Labour Government. The Labour Government did promise a referendum on any constitution but the Lisbon Reform Treaty is not the constitution. Eurosceptics highlight that the Treaty contains 96% of the contents of the original draft constitution. I personally haven't sat down and done a comparison of the two but let us assume that they are correct. As Richard Corbett MEP points out, the DNA of mice and humans is 90% the same - that10% difference is rather important! The constitution would have swept away earlier treaties and meant an entirely new legal order for the Union, the Treaty merely amends the existing order. Most crucially, the UK has negotiated various opt outs and the right to essentially pick and choose what EU policies to sign up for. No such right would have existed under any constitution. There are various other accusations levelled at the Reform Treaty, if you do wish to discuss your concerns about any particular one please do contact me.

So far the Treaty is as I write passing (comparatively) smoothly through the Commons. The Conservatives have been very vocal in their criticism of the Treaty and the decision not to have a referendum. Interestingly, they have been making very foolish promises of a retrospective referendum if they win power at the next general election. Such a referendum would be utterly fruitless. Even if such a referendum resulted in a "no" vote, how do the Conservatives propose to re-negotiate a Treaty that has already been ratified by the 26 other Member States? Any such proposal would inevitably lead to an invitation by the other member states to the UK to invoke clause 49A, the get-out clause in an EU treaty which allows the Member State to quit. This would lead to the Conservatives being left in the rather sticky situation of having to decide on the lesser of two evils: either taking the UK out of the Union or reneging on an electoral promise. Is that the path David Cameron really wants to lead his party and indeed this country down? I very much doubt it!

I agree entirely with Pierre Moscovici (France's Europe Minister from 1997-2002). The new treaty will not mark a political watershed for the EU, rather it is the tool box, the mechanism for decision-making that the Europe of 27 needs and it is the indispensable condition for relaunching the European project and that is why I would lend it my full support.

Gearing up for the 2009 European Elections...

What does the Labour party need from its European Parliamentary candidate?

It needs a candidate who will fight for a greater slice of European funds to provide better investment for projects in our communities.

It needs a candidate who will work with the region’s farmers to help ensure that they receive Union financial support and not corporate agribusiness and large landowners.

It needs a candidate who will help our region’s prestigious universities promote their research and development programmes within the Union and beyond.

It needs a candidate who is close enough to the region’s young people to understand what motivates them, and to encourage them to take advantage of the many educational and other opportunities available to them in Europe.

Finally, it needs a candidate who will work tirelessly to ensure that the East Midlands claims its rightful place among the greatest regions of Europe.

I, fellow Labour Party colleagues, am the candidate who has the enthusiasm, commitment and focus to achieve this. With the benefit of both youth and experience, I believe I will be able to bring new approaches to old problems and hope to encourage a fresh wave of thinking in the Party.

Raised in Grantham, I know the region and what is important to its people by heart. But, after spending time living and working abroad in countries such as Italy, Poland and Japan, I have also learnt how the East Midlands can work with, and learn from, other major regions in Europe and the rest of the world. There is a great wealth of opportunity for businesses and individuals to look beyond the boundaries of the UK, and flourish in new markets.

Since graduating from Oxford University, I have pursued a successful career as a commercial property lawyer in the City of London and in Edinburgh. I believe this experience will stand me in excellent stead in public office as I have learnt how to analyse complex and varied problems, then find workable, effective solutions. These skills will be particularly valuable in Brussels, where the intricacies of European law and the complexities of different member states’ interests, mean individual voices can sometimes be drowned out. I will put my skills to good use in ensuring that the voice of the East Midlands will be heard loud and clear.

My involvement in politics began in 1997, when I volunteered to canvass for Labour along with my father ahead of the General Election. At university, I continued my political activity through my college student union, for which I was elected publicity and campaigns officer. Until now I have been involved with Scottish Labour and have been in discussions about assisting Alistair Darling, Sarah Boyack MSP and Catherine Stihler MEP with their respective campaigns.

Select me for the next European elections and you will be choosing a devoted, yet creative candidate who is prepared to listen to both Party and people and battle for their interests in Europe.